As Cleveland’s $465 million medical mart project inches closer to a groundbreaking, critics still question whether the pricey public investment is worth the untested concept’s risk.
One notable voice joining the conversation is former Pittsburgh Mayor Tom Murphy, now a senior resident fellow at the Urban Land Institute, who spoke to Bloomberg News for a lengthy article about Cleveland’s medical mart gambit. Murphy was mayor of the Western Pennsylvania city from 1994 to 2005.
“It’s a shot in the dark in some ways, in their ability to create a new economic diversity for their economy,” Murphy said. “I would want to see some commitments before I would spend that kind of money.”
With the Rise of AI, What IP Disputes in Healthcare Are Likely to Emerge?
Munck Wilson Mandala Partner Greg Howison shared his perspective on some of the legal ramifications around AI, IP, connected devices and the data they generate, in response to emailed questions.
By saying “that kind of money,” Murphy is referring not only to the medical mart’s $465 million price tag, but to the $840 million the mart could end up costing Cuyahoga County taxpayers. The larger amount factors in costs such as amortization and was an estimate from the St. Louis-based investment bank that is managing a county bond offering for the project.
MMPI, the Chicago-based property developer that’s leading the project, has yet to sign any tenants for the medical mart, a planned collection of medical product showrooms that’s expected to be populated by sellers of medical devices, information technology, furnishings and other equipment. The mart will be connected to a newly renovated convention center in downtown Cleveland.
Others worry that Cuyahoga County taxpayers are footing too-large a percentage of the medical mart’s bill — much of which is covered by a quarter-cent, county-wide sales tax increase passed without a voter referendum — and that MMPI doesn’t have enough “skin in the game.”
MMPI is contributing about $20 million for tenant installations and $8.5 million through forgoing lease payments. It also is responsible for cost, repair and operating overruns, Bloomberg reported.
The Chicago property developer is “getting a convention center and the medical mart property essentially for nothing,” said Heywood Sanders, a professor of public administration at the University of Texas-San Antonio and a critic of publicly subsidized convention centers. “The question is: ‘Can it deliver on its expectations?’ ”
An MMPI spokesman declined comment on criticism of the project, Bloomberg reported.
Cleveland Clinic CEO Toby Cosgrove, who’s credited with helping pioneer the medical mart concept, argues that it wouldn’t be a huge problem if the medical mart didn’t deliver on expectations.
“What’s the worst thing that could happen if this fails?” he asked. “You have a brand new building and a new convention center. So the downside isn’t too bad.”
The taxpayers who’ve footed the bill for Cosgrove’s idea probably would be a little less understanding if the medical mart does indeed fail to deliver jobs and economic development to Northeast Ohio.