Shuzan, a Buddhist monk of the tenth century, once held up a bamboo stick before his disciples. “Call this a stick,” he bellowed, “and you assert; call this not a stick, and you negate. Now, do not assert or negate, what would you call this stick? Speak! Speak!”
From out the ranks, a young monk ventured forth, grabbed the bamboo, and, breaking it in two, exclaimed to Shuzan, “What is this?”*
This phenomenon should not be confused with the “hand-off” errors we’ve heard so much about. Rather, this phenomenon is more insidious. Today, more attending physicians have responsibility for an individual patient at varying times during their inpatient treatment than ever before. For instance, there are ICU attendings, ward/teaching attendings, hospitalist attendings, outpatient attendings (who may or may not want to participate in inpatient care), and specialty attendings – each with their niche of inpatient care.
These days as a consulting physician, for instance, I often wonder after writing my consult that contains recommendations for therapy if I should also write the orders on a patient. In the past, this never happened. Back in earlier times, the senior residents served as the “Commander and Chief” of inpatient care. Attendings were not allowed to enter orders on a patient. That way, the senior resident, in concert with his responsible attending, knew what was and wasn’t to happen with a patient. Everyone caring for the patient knew who had ultimate responsibility to make things happen. With our new model of “team-based care” our Commander in Chief is lost. It is becoming increasingly difficult to know if team caregivers are reading my recommendations and deciding to ignore them or just figuring someone else will implement them. How do I, as a “consultant,” know? Too often, omissions of therapy and the rationale for such are not communicated by today’s disparate and tunnel-visioned caregivers. Leadership is not easily assumed when everyone feels they are the leader.
With the Rise of AI, What IP Disputes in Healthcare Are Likely to Emerge?
Munck Wilson Mandala Partner Greg Howison shared his perspective on some of the legal ramifications around AI, IP, connected devices and the data they generate, in response to emailed questions.
These are the challenges doctors face going forward as physicians ultimately responsible for our patients’ well-being in our new era of team-based care. In many respects, these challenges are not new. But administrators squeezed by cost concerns should also be sensitive to the growing challenges caregivers encounter in this environment.
And doctors, like the young monk who steps forward in the story at the beginning of this post, mustn’t forget how to take the stick.
After all, the computers won’t do it for us.
* From: An Introduction to Zen Buddhism, by D.T. Suzuki (Grove Press, 1964).
Westby G. Fisher, MD, FACC is a board certified internist, cardiologist, and cardiac electrophysiologist (doctor specializing in heart rhythm disorders) practicing at NorthShore University HealthSystem in Evanston, IL, USA and is a Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at University of Chicago's Pritzker School of Medicine. He entered the blog-o-sphere in November, 2005. He writes regularly at Dr. Wes. DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in this blog are strictly the those of the author(s) and should not be construed as the opinion(s) or policy(ies) of NorthShore University HealthSystem, nor recommendations for your care or anyone else's. Please seek professional guidance instead.