<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Higher copays backfire: MedCity Morning Read, Feb. 9, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medcitynews.com/2010/02/higher-copays-backfire-medcity-morning-read-feb-9-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medcitynews.com/2010/02/higher-copays-backfire-medcity-morning-read-feb-9-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=higher-copays-backfire-medcity-morning-read-feb-9-2010</link>
	<description>MedCity News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: When marketing trumps medicine: MedCity Morning Read, Feb. 15, 2010 : MedCity News</title>
		<link>http://www.medcitynews.com/2010/02/higher-copays-backfire-medcity-morning-read-feb-9-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-59611</link>
		<dc:creator>When marketing trumps medicine: MedCity Morning Read, Feb. 15, 2010 : MedCity News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medcitynews.com/?p=19712#comment-59611</guid>
		<description>[...] a doctor whose care routinely fell below adequate standards. And for doing the right thing, she was charged with a felony. Thankfully, it took a jury less than an hour to acquit her. &#8220;If anything was to be gained [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a doctor whose care routinely fell below adequate standards. And for doing the right thing, she was charged with a felony. Thankfully, it took a jury less than an hour to acquit her. &#8220;If anything was to be gained [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JourneyHome</title>
		<link>http://www.medcitynews.com/2010/02/higher-copays-backfire-medcity-morning-read-feb-9-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-57600</link>
		<dc:creator>JourneyHome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medcitynews.com/?p=19712#comment-57600</guid>
		<description>â€œUse Senate reconciliation and expand Medicare via the Senateâ€™s buy-in provisions. The CBO has already signed off on this as a means of saving money. 

More importantly, if more Americans can do a buy-in with Medicare, it creates more cost control (because thereâ€™s a genuine â€œpublic optionâ€ competitor). 

It also helps to solve the problems of pre-existing conditions, because Medicare does not deny coverage on this basis.

Allowing a Medicare buy-in to Americans under 65 would give people a genuine alternative to private insurance and thereby render the pre-existing question moot. 

It would also lower Medicare costs by expanding the risk pool of patients (the great bulk of medical expenses are accounted for by a small number of people, mostly the elderly, requiring very expensive treatment). 

And it would substantially enhance the global competitiveness of American corporations. After all, in what other country in the world is health care a marginal cost of production for business?â€ - Roosevelt Institute Marshall Auerback</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œUse Senate reconciliation and expand Medicare via the Senateâ€™s buy-in provisions. The CBO has already signed off on this as a means of saving money. </p>
<p>More importantly, if more Americans can do a buy-in with Medicare, it creates more cost control (because thereâ€™s a genuine â€œpublic optionâ€ competitor). </p>
<p>It also helps to solve the problems of pre-existing conditions, because Medicare does not deny coverage on this basis.</p>
<p>Allowing a Medicare buy-in to Americans under 65 would give people a genuine alternative to private insurance and thereby render the pre-existing question moot. </p>
<p>It would also lower Medicare costs by expanding the risk pool of patients (the great bulk of medical expenses are accounted for by a small number of people, mostly the elderly, requiring very expensive treatment). </p>
<p>And it would substantially enhance the global competitiveness of American corporations. After all, in what other country in the world is health care a marginal cost of production for business?â€ &#8211; Roosevelt Institute Marshall Auerback</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.medcitynews.com @ 2012-02-13 01:31:30 -->
