<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ohio doctors group &#8216;likely to oppose&#8217; proposed law that would require monitoring of prescription database</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medcitynews.com/2010/01/ohio-doctors-group-likely-to-oppose-proposed-law-that-would-require-monitoring-of-prescription-database/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medcitynews.com/2010/01/ohio-doctors-group-likely-to-oppose-proposed-law-that-would-require-monitoring-of-prescription-database/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ohio-doctors-group-likely-to-oppose-proposed-law-that-would-require-monitoring-of-prescription-database</link>
	<description>MedCity News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLKERR</title>
		<link>http://www.medcitynews.com/2010/01/ohio-doctors-group-likely-to-oppose-proposed-law-that-would-require-monitoring-of-prescription-database/comment-page-1/#comment-53380</link>
		<dc:creator>DLKERR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medcitynews.com/?p=18380#comment-53380</guid>
		<description>Regarding OARRS;
It is easy to sign into the database IF you are qualified; It is easy enough to
use. For a doctor the problem is that it MUST be the doctor himself or herself to access the program- no agents or assistents allowed. Then if you do find a 
probelm you are not generally allowed to pass on the information directly to other health care providers that might be concerned.                           The solution might be to ease up on the access (office employees have access to everything else anyway) and require a look-up for for C-II scrips only. 
C-III and C-IV are subject to abuse, but the hardcore problems are the C-II.
A proper internet hook-up and this look-up by the employee on behalf of the 
doctor will only take a minute-less than doing the insurance checks. THEN provide for limited exemptions to the look-up for out of office circumstances.
Most current professionals have some mobile internet capability anyway.dlk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding OARRS;<br />
It is easy to sign into the database IF you are qualified; It is easy enough to<br />
use. For a doctor the problem is that it MUST be the doctor himself or herself to access the program- no agents or assistents allowed. Then if you do find a<br />
probelm you are not generally allowed to pass on the information directly to other health care providers that might be concerned.                           The solution might be to ease up on the access (office employees have access to everything else anyway) and require a look-up for for C-II scrips only.<br />
C-III and C-IV are subject to abuse, but the hardcore problems are the C-II.<br />
A proper internet hook-up and this look-up by the employee on behalf of the<br />
doctor will only take a minute-less than doing the insurance checks. THEN provide for limited exemptions to the look-up for out of office circumstances.<br />
Most current professionals have some mobile internet capability anyway.dlk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.medcitynews.com @ 2012-02-13 07:12:47 -->
