
Robotic ViKY helps perform a single-incision hysterectomy at MetroHealth Medical Center.
CLEVELAND, Ohio — On the eve of her hysterectomy, Paula Miller was as excited about making medical history as she was being freed from the excruciating pain and nausea of her menstrual period.
The 37-year-old mammogram technician would the next day have her uterus removed by a surgeon at MetroHealth Medical Center who she had just met but trusted immediately: Dr. Kevin Stepp.
“It’s amazing the technology they come up with, that I’m going to be part of medical history with him,” said Miller, who also works at MetroHealth. “It’s very exciting.”
Stepp wanted to remove the organ through a single incision in Miller’s belly button — something he had done dozens of times before — but this time with the help of a robotic system called ViKY. The system would enable him to perform the surgery by himself — without the usual one or two assistants.
The surgery also was exciting for Clement Vidal, chief executive of EndoControl of Grenoble, France, the maker of ViKY (which is a French acronym that describes the way the device functions). Vidal wanted to watch how used his company’s technology so he could tell other surgeons how to use it.
It would be the first time ViKY wouldbe used anywhere in the world to both guide the laparoscopic video camera and light that ”see” inside Miller’s abdomen, as well as position her uterus during surgery.
Surgical robots enable surgeons to go places inside the body where their hands and hand-held instruments don’t fit. With robotic devices, surgeons can navigate a blood vessel, repair a heart valve from the inside and remove a uterus (through the vagina) by working through one small incision in the belly button.
Robotic technologies also are cool. Dr. Miranda Bailey, a surgeon on ABC’s Gray’s Anatomy television show, acted like a kid in a candy shop when fictional Seattle Grace Hospital got its first multi-station DaVinci Surgical System. DaVinci has made the rounds at medical conventions, attracting lines of doctors who want to try the system that operates something like a video game.
DaVinci is a sophisticated surgical technology made by Intuitive Surgical Inc. that enables surgeons to operate remotely — they sit in front of a computer screen and use a console of levers and buttons to move instruments that operate on patients who are located several feet away.
ViKY looks nothing like DaVinci. Rather, the French company’s device looks more like a medical instrument-holder on a circular base.
That’s okay with Stepp, assistant professor at Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, who found the device by keeping track of the search term “single-incision laparoscopy” in his Google Reader. Stepp likes ViKY partly because he can do surgery at the side of his patient, using the robot like a couple extra pairs of hands.
ViKY also is a bit of a David-and-Goliath story. The device was born in 2000 in a laboratory at Grenoble University, Vidal said. “And in 2005, we decided to transfer it to the industry,” he said.
“So, there are all sorts of little startups that are trying to come up with better robots,” said Stepp, who also is fellowship director of minimally invasive surgery and urogynecology. “Just like when you bought an IBM computer in the 1960s, it was big as a house and cost twice as much, but now, I have one on my hip.”
One of two things usually happen to these surgical robot start-ups. ”They either get bought up by Intuitive (the maker of DaVinci),” or they start making their own headway, he said.
The global market for surgical robots each year is about $1 billion, Vidal said. Intuitive Surgical, maker of DaVinci, dominates that market, accounting for more than 90 percent of sales, he said.
The first of four ViKY components — an endoscope holder — was CE Mark approved for sale in Europe in 2007, Vidal said. In December, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved ViKY for sale in this country.
Unlike daVinci, ViKY is simpler, smaller and specialized to do certain surgical tasks, Vidal said. ViKY also costs a fraction of daVinci, which can do many more surgical jobs. “The DaVinci is $1.7 million for the old version, and $200,000 a year to maintain it,” Stepp said. “All said and done, the four components of the robotic [ViKY] system should cost around $150,000 or $170,000.”
Stepp used ViKY’s endoscope holder three months ago. Today, he also will use the system’s second component — a uterus manipulator. The surgeon has no financial relationships with EndoControl.
He begins surgery by fixing two ViKY units to rails on the operating room table. One unit is positioned above Miller’s belly button, the other just outside her vagina.
Using foot pedals, Stepp can move the units holding the laparoscopic camera and light and the uterine manipulator in or out, up or down, and right or left. Surgical technicians who usually operate the camera or move the uterus during surgery stand nearby, arms crossed, watching.
A half-dozen MetroHealth surgeons walk in and out of the operating room to watch their colleague perform his first laparoscopic hysterectomy by himself. Stepp asks questions of Vidaland gives him feedback on how the devices work throughout the surgery.
Stepp and his partner, Dr. Rob Pollard, have performed about 45 single-incision hysterectomies over the last year. For women who can’t have their uteruses removed vaginally, ”this is absolutely the least invasive way to do it with just a single incision through the belly button, he said.
Inexpensive surgical technologies like ViKYalso could lower health care costs. ”For example, each component of this device certainly costs less than what you would pay a surgical tech over the course of a year,” Stepp said.
Comments
Post a comment
This article makes it sound like the Da Vinci robotic surgical system to perform hysterectomy is simple and inconsequential.
It describes this gynecologist controlled robotic surgery as less invasive, implying that it is safe. If you watch the surgery being performed on the Da Vinci web site (click on the video for physicians, not the sanitized patient version) you will quickly see that this is highly invasive destructive surgery.
Hysterectomy is the surgical removal of the uterus, a reproductive, sexual, hormone responsive organ that supports the bladder and bowel. Whether the surgery is performed abdominally, vaginally, hands-on laparoscopically or laparoscopically by a gynecologist controlled robot, a hormone responsive sex organ is removed, the vagina is shortened, and there is a loss of support to the bladder and bowel. Women who experienced uterine orgasm before the surgery will not experience it after the uterus is removed.
When the uterus is removed women have three times greater incidence of cardiovascular disease than women with an intact uterus. When the ovaries are removed the incidence seven times greater.
There are 22 million women in the United States whose female organs have been surgically removed. Only about 2% were life saving and 98% were elective, a euphemism for unwarranted. Girls and women are not educated about the functions of female organs and they are not informed about the adverse effects of hysterectomy that have been well documented in medical literature for over a century.
Women who might ignore this promotion in a commercial advertisement will be vulnerable to believing there are no adverse effects of the surgery. An article that makes hysterectomy sound simple and inconsequential is dangerous to women.
Comment by Nora W. Coffey — June 14, 2009 @ 9:21 pm
In response to Nora Coffey’s comments dated 6/14/09, she should re-read the article more carefully. Although the article does mention the da Vinci Surgical System, the robotic medical device being described is the ViKY. Also, “elective” does not necessariy mean “unwarranted.” Many hysterectomies are performed for reasons other than to save a life. For example, women who experience painful, uncontrollable bleeding or recurring fibroids which cannot be managed by medication or ablation may elect to resolve the issue through hysterectomy. While not necessary “life saving,” the procedure is considered by many to be “life changing.” Lastly, Ms. Coffey describes da Vinci Hysterectomy as “highly invasive destructive surgery.” By all standards, it is minimally invasive surgery, in which instruments measuring 8mm diameter are inserted into the abdomen, as opposed to an 8-12 inch incision made during open surgery. It sounds as though Ms. Coffey takes issue with hysterectomy as a procedure in general, not the da Vinci Surgical approach specifically.
Comment by Nora Julian — June 23, 2009 @ 2:52 pm
Post a Comment